Ofsted has announced proposals for a new inspection model in schools in England.
Here the PA news agency looks at what Ofsted is proposing to change, and how it will look.
– What way did Ofsted previously rate schools?
Schools in England were issued with one of four judgments for overall effectiveness – outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate – when inspected.
This was scrapped last year following criticism of the inspection system since the death of headteacher Ruth Perry.
Mrs Perry took her own life after an Ofsted report downgraded her Caversham Primary School in Reading from its highest rating of “outstanding” to its lowest rating, “inadequate”, over safeguarding concerns.
A coroner concluded the Ofsted inspection in November 2022 “contributed” to Mrs Perry’s death.
– What do parents and teachers think about how a school should be inspected?
Ofsted said a consultation – called the Big Listen – returned a clear message from parents, carers and professionals that the overall effectiveness grade should go, and that inspection reports should provide a more nuanced view of a provider’s strengths and areas for improvement.
But it said there were different views on how to do that – parents and carers favoured a clear assessment of a wider set of categories, while most professionals wanted narrative descriptions of performance.
– What is Ofsted now proposing to do?
Ofsted is proposing that schools, early years providers, and further education and skills providers, in England, could be graded across a variety of different areas using a colour-coded five-point scale – with inspectors producing a report card.
Sir Martyn Oliver, chief inspector of Ofsted, said it would be “a bit like a child’s school report card” and would highlight all the things that schools excel at as well as the areas where they could improve.
He said the report card give a “far better balanced, more realistic and a fairer picture of all of a school’s strengths and areas for improvement”.
In a consultation document, Ofsted said the proposals will allow inspectors to “highlight poor practice with more precision – pointing laser-like to specific issues, not shining a floodlight on the whole provider”.
– What will the report card look like and what is the colour-coded scale?
Schools would receive ratings – from the red coloured “causing concern” to orange coloured “attention needed”, through the green shades of “secure”, “strong” and “exemplary” – for each area of practice.
Areas rated would include leadership and governance, curriculum, developing teaching, achievement, behaviour and attitudes, attendance, personal development and well-being, and inclusion.
Safeguarding would not be graded with the five-point scale and instead it would be assessed as either met or not met under the plans.
Evaluation areas for early years providers would include aspects such as behaviour, attitudes and establishing routine.
The grade will be accompanied by short summaries of inspectors’ findings in more detail.
An overall effectiveness grade will not be awarded.
– What will happen when weaknesses are identified in a school?
Ofsted said it is proposing that all schools with an identified need for improvement will receive monitoring calls and visits, to check that timely action is being taken to raise standards.
This includes schools with any evaluation area graded “attention needed”.
Ofsted said it will only monitor for as long as is necessary to see a tangible difference for children.
– What has been the response to these new proposals?
The proposals have been criticised by Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders’ union NAHT, who said they “suggest an inspectorate determined to hold on to a model of inspection that is long past its sell-by date”.
And Pepe Di’Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said the proposed school report cards “appear to be even worse than the single-word judgments they replace”.
Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union, said the proposals “will make matters worse, not better”.
